About this site
What the site covers
AI Field Notes collects cases of companies and public bodies using AI. Each case covers the problem, approach, results and takeaway.
Setbacks sit alongside successes so readers can see what went wrong.
Reading a case
Each figure shows who reported it.
| Company's own claim | The company's release, report, executive interview or earnings call, even when the press repeats it |
|---|---|
| Vendor's case study | A customer story published by the AI supplier |
| Press reporting | Findings or measurements made directly by journalists |
| Independent study | Results measured in a peer-reviewed or clearly independent study |
| Regulator, audit or court | Findings by a regulator, auditor, tribunal or court |
Official links to the organization’s own publication. Vendor means the account comes from the AI supplier’s customer story.
Outcomes
| Working | Use at scale with reported results |
| In progress | Ongoing use without reported results yet |
| Scaled back | Continued use with a reduced scope or partial rollback |
| Stopped | Projects stopped or withdrawn, or subject to adverse rulings |
Keep in mind
- Most figures are the organizations’ own claims and are rarely audited.
- Public sources cover large firms and successes more than small firms and failures that pass unnoticed.
- Each case reflects its sources when added. Later news may be missing.
To correct a case or suggest one, email chaekzom.com@gmail.com.
Fonts: Instrument Sans, Pretendard, JetBrains Mono (SIL Open Font License). Flags: flag-icons (MIT). Home photo: mos.ru via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 4.0), resized, cropped and darkened.