← Cases
ItalyPublic sector2021–2024

Comune di Trento

Marvel and Protector AI surveillance research projects

Italian regulator fined the city of Trento EUR 50,000 over two EU-funded AI surveillance projects using street microphones and social media

StoppedRegulator, audit or court

Problem

The city took part in EU-funded smart-city research on detecting public-safety risks from cameras, microphones and online posts.

Approach

Marvel combined existing city CCTV with audio from street microphones, and AI analysed it to detect risk events. Protector used CCTV without sound plus hateful social media posts to flag threats to places of worship. The city said data were anonymised right after collection. The Garante decided on 11 January 2024 that the city had no legal basis, that anonymisation was insufficient and that notices did not say microphones could record conversations. It also found no impact assessment, fined the city and ordered deletion of the data.

Results

EUR 50,000fine imposed by the Italian data protection authorityRegulator, audit or court[1][2]

Takeaway

Taking part in EU research did not give the city a legal basis to process residents' data. The regulator said it was open to talks on AI projects that follow privacy rules.

Categories

Business function
Production and quality
Innovation type
Process innovation
Evidence
Regulator, audit or court

Sources

  1. Press release on the sanction against the Comune di Trento (Marvel and Protector projects)
    Garante per la protezione dei dati personali25 Jan 2024Regulator, audit or court document

Source summaries

[1]Garante per la protezione dei dati personali25 Jan 2024

The authority's release on its 11 January 2024 decision. It fined Trento EUR 50,000 and ordered deletion of unlawfully processed data. Grounds include no legal basis, data shared with partners, weak anonymisation, unclear notices about microphones and no proven impact assessment.

[2]l'Adige25 Jan 2024

Local newspaper report on the fine. It describes Marvel (CCTV plus street microphones) and Protector (CCTV plus social media hate messages), notes the city's claim of immediate anonymisation and the Garante's rejection of it.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 25 Oct 2026 · Updated 25 Oct 2026
Open case page ↗