← Cases
United StatesPublic sector2017 – ongoing

Detroit Police Department

Facial-recognition leads in criminal investigations

Detroit restricted facial-recognition investigations after Robert Williams's wrongful arrest

Scaled backRegulator, audit or court

Problem

Detroit police used facial recognition to generate investigative leads from images of unidentified suspects.

Approach

The department's facial-recognition request log began in 2017. A false match led to Robert Williams's wrongful arrest in January 2020, according to his lawyers. A June 2024 court-enforceable settlement required independent reliable evidence before a facial-recognition lead could support a photo lineup or arrest, additional training and an audit of earlier cases. Police retained the technology, and a deputy chief said the revised practices would prevent future misidentifications.

Results

4 yearsperiod of federal court jurisdiction to enforce the settlementRegulator, audit or court[1]

Takeaway

A computer-generated lead passed into an identification and arrest process without sufficient independent corroboration. The settlement placed new requirements on the human investigation surrounding the match.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Computer vision
Evidence
Regulator, audit or court

Sources

  1. Williams v. City of Detroit: Order Approving Settlement Agreement and Dismissing Case
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan28 Jun 2024Regulator, audit or court document
  2. Williams v. City of Detroit
    American Civil Liberties Union28 Jun 2024Research paper or report

Source summaries

[1]U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan28 Jun 2024

The order and attached agreement established enforceable restrictions on lineups, arrests, training and disclosure. They required an audit using records beginning in February 2017 and retained court enforcement for four years.

[2]American Civil Liberties Union28 Jun 2024

Williams's legal representatives described the false match and wrongful arrest in January 2020. They explained the independent-evidence requirements and retrospective audit secured in the settlement.

[3]CBS Detroit1 Jul 2024

Police defended the tool. A deputy chief expressed confidence in the new safeguards.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 4 Nov 2026 · Updated 4 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗