← Cases
MalaysiaPublic sector2020 – ongoing

Courts of Sabah and Sarawak

AI sentencing recommendation pilot

Judges in Sabah and Sarawak followed an AI sentencing recommendation in about a third of cases, a think tank found

In progressIndependent study

Problem

Courts in Sabah and Sarawak wanted more consistent sentences for similar offences and less time spent reading past case files.

Approach

Sarawak Information Systems, a state government company, built software trained on five years of past cases (2014 to 2019). It recommended sentences for drug possession in Sabah and for rape and sexual assault in Sarawak. The recommendation was not binding, and judges kept their discretion. Kuala Lumpur courts started a similar trial in mid-2021 covering 20 types of crime.

Results

~1/3share of cases in which judges followed the AI recommendation, per Khazanah Research InstituteIndependent study[1]
a few minutes vs 1+ hourAI analysis time compared with the time a judge may spend reading case files, per the Chief Judge of Sabah and SarawakCompany's own claim[2]

Takeaway

Khazanah Research Institute found that judges followed the AI recommendation in about a third of cases, while the Chief Judge reported time savings. Lawyers and the Bar Council criticised the lack of consultation and guidelines.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
Evidence
Independent study

Sources

  1. FEATURE-As Malaysia tests AI court sentencing, some lawyers fear for justice
    Thomson Reuters Foundation (via Devdiscourse)12 Apr 2022News article

Source summaries

[1]Thomson Reuters Foundation (via Devdiscourse)12 Apr 2022

The Thomson Reuters Foundation reports that Sabah and Sarawak courts piloted the tool built by Sarawak Information Systems, and that Kuala Lumpur courts joined in mid-2021. It cites Khazanah Research Institute's finding that judges followed the recommendation in about a third of rape and drug possession cases. A lawyer, the Bar Council and a Singapore law professor raised objections. The Chief Justice's office said use was still at trial stage.

[2]GovInsider2022

GovInsider interviewed Chief Judge Abang Iskandar. He said the system covers drug possession in Sabah and rape cases in Sarawak, analyses past files in minutes and gives a non-binding recommendation. He also described planned use in civil cases such as injury compensation.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 25 Oct 2026 · Updated 25 Oct 2026
Open case page ↗