← Cases
United StatesRetail and e-commerce2026 – ongoing

Savers Value Village

ThriftIQ AI pricing tool for donated apparel

Savers Value Village prices donated clothes with ThriftIQ in 58 stores and reports about 100 basis points more gross profit growth

In progressCompany's own claim

Problem

Store staff graded each donated garment by condition and quality, and the grade set the price by category. Two employees could price the same item differently.

Approach

Savers built ThriftIQ with Kaizen Analytix on its own data. Staff now identify only the brand. The system combines the brand with seasonality and sell-through data to set the price. By the second-quarter 2026 earnings call the tool was live in 58 of 375 stores in the US and Canada. Savers said it is not dynamic pricing, because a price does not change once the item is tagged.

Results

about 100 basis pointshigher gross profit dollar growth in pilot stores than in non-pilot stores, per Savers' CFOCompany's own claim[1]
58 of 375 storesstores using ThriftIQ at the time of the Q2 2026 earnings callCompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

The results come from a pilot comparison reported by the CFO on an earnings call. Savers did not publish the underlying data.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

Source summaries

[1]Gizmodo8 Aug 2026

Gizmodo reported on Savers' second-quarter 2026 earnings call. Executives described how ThriftIQ replaced manual grading with brand-based pricing and said it was live in 58 stores. The CFO cited about 100 basis points higher gross profit dollar growth in pilot stores. The CEO told CNBC the company does not use AI for dynamic pricing.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 2 Nov 2026 · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗