United StatesProfessional services2026 – ongoing

Shipman & Goodwin

Harvey for litigation preparation and transactional document review

Shipman & Goodwin's regular Harvey users reported saving more than 10 hours per week

WorkingCompany's own claimOfficial ↗Vendor ↗

Problem

Repetitive document work consumed lawyers' time across multiple matters. The firm wanted to reduce preparation work while maintaining client service.

Approach

The firm's AI committee evaluated roughly 10 tools before selecting Harvey. Lawyers used it to rebuild deposition outlines and analyze closing documents. A partner also built a custom agent for recurring NDA review.

Results

more than 10 hoursaverage weekly time saved, as reported by regular Harvey usersCompany's own claim[1]

about 2 hoursdeposition-outline preparation that a partner estimated would otherwise take 1 or 2 daysCompany's own claim[2]

Takeaway

The weekly savings were self-reported by regular users. Individual document-review examples did not establish a firmwide average turnaround time.

Sources

Shipman & Goodwin Featured in Harvey Customer Story Highlighting Firm's Thoughtful Integration of AI
Shipman & Goodwin LLP1 Oct 2026Company publication
Shipman & Goodman | Harvey
Harvey2026Vendor publication

Source summaries

[1]Shipman & Goodwin LLP1 Oct 2026

The firm confirmed its use of Harvey after evaluating roughly 10 AI tools. Regular users reported average savings of more than 10 hours each week. It described the saved time as available for substantive legal work and business development.

[2]Harvey2026

Harvey described deposition preparation and transactional review at Shipman & Goodwin. A partner reported completing deposition-outline work in about 2 hours instead of an estimated 1 or 2 days. Another partner used a custom agent for NDA review.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 1 Nov 2026 · Updated 1 Nov 2026