← Cases
United StatesPublic sector2023 – ongoing

Covered California

Automated verification of eligibility documents

Covered California's pilot validated 84% of eligibility documents automatically, up from 28-30% with its old system

In progressVendor case studyVendor ↗

Problem

Covered California received about 50,000 documents a month in 56 classifications, and staff checked 71% of them by hand. It could take weeks to find that someone had sent the wrong form or wrong information. That created extra work for staff and for residents.

Approach

In 2023 the agency ran a small pilot of Google Cloud's Document AI with Deloitte, which extracts data from documents with machine learning. The team used the tool out of the box, without extra training, to set a benchmark. A launch was planned for June 2024, ahead of the October open enrollment.

Results

84%average share of documents validated automatically in the pilot, with a range of 80-96% by document type, per Google CloudVendor case study[1]
28-30%automated verification rate of the legacy solution, for comparison, per Google CloudVendor case study[1]
more than 95%automated verification rate the agency named as its target, not yet reached, per Google CloudVendor case study[1]

Takeaway

An untrained, off-the-shelf document tool already beat the agency's old automated checks by a wide margin. The agency still had to train it further to reach its own target.

Categories

Business function
Production and quality
Innovation type
Process innovation
Evidence
Vendor case study

Sources

Source summaries

[1]Google Cloud14 Jan 2025

Google Cloud's customer story describes how Covered California piloted Document AI with Deloitte to verify identity and income documents. The pilot validated 80-96% of documents depending on type, 84% on average, against 28-30% for the old system. The agency handles about 50,000 documents a month and aims for more than 95% automated verification. The page carries no date; the Internet Archive first saved it on January 14, 2025.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 4 Nov 2026 · Updated 4 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗