← Cases
United StatesTechnology and telecom2025 – ongoing

Delight.ai

Internal debugging and regression-testing tools for production AI agents, built with Claude Code

Delight.ai cut the time to fix a production AI agent issue from a week to one or two days with internal tools built in Claude Code

WorkingVendor case studyVendor ↗

Problem

Delight.ai runs AI customer support agents for its clients. Finding why a live agent behaved wrongly, and checking a fix before redeploying it, took the AI/ML team about a week.

Approach

The AI/ML team started using Claude Code in November 2025 to build its own tooling. One tool is a conversation debugger that compares the behavior an agent was expected to show with what it actually did. Another generates and runs simulated conversations at scale to regression-test agents before they reach customers. Claude runs on Amazon Bedrock and through the direct Anthropic API.

Results

1-2 daystime to fix and redeploy a production AI agent issue, down from 1 week, per AnthropicVendor case study[1]

Takeaway

Delight.ai's team built its own debugging and testing tools instead of waiting for a vendor to supply them. The company did not say how it measured the drop in fix time.

Categories

Business function
IT and R&D
Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Vendor case study

Sources

Source summaries

[1]Anthropic24 Jun 2026

Anthropic's customer story describes how Delight.ai's AI/ML team used Claude Code to build a conversation debugger and a simulated-conversation regression testing tool for its production AI agents. It reports that the time to fix and redeploy an agent issue fell from 1 week to 1-2 days. The page carries no date; the Internet Archive first saved it on June 24, 2026.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 4 Nov 2026 · Updated 4 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗