IBM
watsonx Code Assistant used by IBM's own software teams
IBM project teams cut code documentation time by 59% on average with an AI code assistant
Problem
IBM software teams spent long hours reading, documenting and testing code. One team inherited more than 50 undocumented code repositories with about 750 JavaScript files.
Approach
IBM ran an internal watsonx challenge in 2024 in which project teams used watsonx Code Assistant for code explanation, documentation, code generation and test case generation. The assistant worked through an integrated chat. Teams reported their own time savings.
Results
Takeaway
Savings differed by task. Explaining and documenting code saved more time than generating code or tests. The results are self-reported by the teams.
Categories
- Size
- Large enterprise
- Industry
- Technology and telecom
- Business function
- IT and R&D
- Innovation type
- Process innovation
- AI technology
- Generative AI
- Adoption
- Built in-house
- Evidence
- Vendor case study
Sources
Source summaries
IBM describes an internal challenge where software teams used watsonx Code Assistant on their own projects. It gives average time savings by task: 56% for code explanation, 59% for documentation, 38% for code generation and 38% for test generation. It says the team-level results were self-reported.
Full details are in the original sources.