← Cases
TaiwanManufacturing2026 – ongoing

Makalot Industrial

AI-assisted garment design proposals

Makalot cut parts of its design proposal work from 10 days to 2 and said faster individuals did not mean a faster company

In progressCompany's own claim

Problem

A proposal of 10 to 15 garment designs took about 10 working days and passed through at least five departments. The steps were trend research, sketches, paper patterns and virtual or physical sampling.

Approach

Makalot used AI in these design steps. A Makalot director described the results at an APEC AI design seminar in Taipei in September 2026. The company has since been consolidating data from factories, customers and specifications, connecting data flows through APIs and feeding industry knowledge into its AI.

Results

10 working days to 2 daystime for parts of a design proposal, reported by a Makalot director; with 1 designer instead of at least 5 departmentsCompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

Makalot said speeding up single tasks did not by itself speed up the whole company. Designers could generate attractive garments that could not be made, sales staff could present polished data that rested on AI hallucinations, and tools adopted by factories did not always exchange data with headquarters systems.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

  1. APEC AI設計研討會在台北!聚陽10天工作2天做完,卻藏新難題?
    Global Views Monthly (City Academy)20 Sep 2026News article

Source summaries

[1]Global Views Monthly (City Academy)20 Sep 2026

Reports a Makalot director's talk at an APEC AI design seminar in Taipei. A 10 to 15 design proposal took about 10 working days across at least five departments, and with AI some steps took 2 days and 1 designer. The talk also named new bottlenecks: unmakeable designs, AI-hallucinated data and unconnected factory systems.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 2 Nov 2026 · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗