← Cases
United StatesHealthcare and life sciences2025 – ongoing

Merck & Co. (MSD)

Generative AI drafting of clinical study reports

Merck reported cutting human-reviewed clinical report draft effort from 180 to 80 hours

WorkingCompany's own claimOfficial ↗

Problem

Medical writers had to reconcile large volumes of clinical data and prepare reports in regulatory language.

Approach

Merck combined table preprocessing with LLM drafting under medical-writer oversight. Teams produced and submitted the first live clinical study reports using the platform in early 2025.

Results

80 hourseffort for a fully human-reviewed first draft, down from an average of 180 hours, per MerckCompany's own claim[1]
50%reduction in draft errors reported by MerckCompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

The reported effort reduction included human review. It did not establish a measured reduction in medicine approval time.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

Source summaries

[1]Merck25 Jun 2025

Merck reported submitted clinical reports using its new platform. It claimed lower human-reviewed drafting effort and a 50% reduction in errors across multiple studies.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 1 Nov 2026 · Updated 1 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗