← Cases
United KingdomHealthcare and life sciences2024 – ongoing

NHS England

NHS.UK Reviews automoderation tool

NHS England automated patient-review moderation, then retired the tool

StoppedCompany's own claim

Problem

Patient reviews of NHS services posted on NHS.UK had to be checked by staff before publication, including for complaints, self-harm talk and personal names.

Approach

NHS England used natural language processing to check reviews before publication. It updated its data protection assessment in February 2024 for the switch from manual to automated moderation and published error rates for four detection models. It later listed the tool as retired without giving a reason or date.

Results

0.99 recall, 0.85 precisionDetection of suicide and self-harm ideation in reviewsCompany's own claim[1]
0.85 recall, 0.87 precisionDetection of complaints in reviewsCompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

NHS England retired a tool for which it had published detection results for four models. It gave no reason, so the results do not explain the decision to stop using it.

Categories

Business function
Production and quality
Innovation type
Process innovation
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

  1. NHS England: NHS.UK Reviews Automoderation Tool - Algorithmic Transparency Record
    GOV.UK (NHS England)23 Jul 2024Government publication

Source summaries

[1]GOV.UK (NHS England)23 Jul 2024

NHS England published false-positive and false-negative rates, recall and precision for four models used to moderate patient reviews. The self-harm detection model had recall of 0.99 and precision of 0.85, while complaint detection had recall of 0.85 and precision of 0.87. NHS England listed the tool as retired without explaining why.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 25 Oct 2026 · Updated 25 Oct 2026
Open case page ↗