← Cases
NetherlandsPublic sector2017–2021

City of Rotterdam

Machine-learning risk scoring of welfare recipients

Rotterdam put its welfare fraud model on hold in 2021 after finding bias it could not remove

StoppedCompany's own claim

Problem

Rotterdam wanted to pick which of its roughly 30,000 welfare recipients to investigate for fraud each year.

Approach

Since 2017 the city used a machine learning model that gave each recipient a score from 0 to 1 using 315 variables. About 1,000 people a year were referred for investigation. Lighthouse Reports analysed the model in 2023 and found it biased against some groups.

Results

about 50%How much more accurate than random selection, per Rotterdam's internal documents cited by Lighthouse ReportsCompany's own claim[1]
30,000Welfare recipients scored each year, about 1,000 of them referred for investigationPress reporting[1]

Takeaway

Per Lighthouse, the city's own evaluations found the model only about 50 percent more accurate than random selection. The city suspended it in mid-2021 after assessments found bias it could not eliminate.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

  1. Suspicion Machines Methodology
    Lighthouse Reports2 Mar 2023News article

Source summaries

[1]Lighthouse Reports2 Mar 2023

Lighthouse Reports describes how it obtained and tested Rotterdam's risk-scoring model, including its inputs and score thresholds. It reports the city's internal accuracy finding and the 2021 suspension.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 25 Oct 2026 · Updated 25 Oct 2026
Open case page ↗