← Cases
GermanyMedia and entertainment2024 – ongoing

Springer Nature

Geppetto and SnappShot AI screening of manuscripts

Springer Nature said its Geppetto tool caught hundreds of fake papers before publication

In progressCompany's own claimOfficial ↗

Problem

Paper mills sell fake research, and AI-generated text and manipulated images make such papers harder to spot in peer review.

Approach

The publisher built two tools in house. Geppetto splits a paper into sections and scores each for the likelihood of AI-generated text. SnappShot checks PDFs for duplicated gel and blot images. High scores go to staff for manual review, and neither tool decides on its own. After pilots, both were being rolled out in 2024, with SnappShot planned to cover other image types.

Results

hundredsfake papers identified by Geppetto soon after submission, per Springer NatureCompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

The tools only flag papers, so editors still make every decision. The count of fake papers comes from the publisher and was not independently checked.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

  1. Springer Nature unveils two new AI tools to protect research integrity
    Springer Nature12 Jun 2024Company publication

Source summaries

[1]Springer Nature12 Jun 2024

The press release announces the rollout of Geppetto and SnappShot after successful pilots. It says Geppetto already identified hundreds of fake papers and that both tools trigger human checks rather than decide.

[2]The Decoder16 Jun 2024

The article describes both tools and repeats the publisher's claim of hundreds of fake papers flagged. It notes the publisher did not explain how Geppetto works.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 1 Nov 2026 · Updated 1 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗