← Cases
South KoreaPublic sector2024 – ongoing

Architecture & Urban Research Institute

Archilaw V2 building-code interpretation pilot

AURI reported 78% agreement between Archilaw V2 and officials' definitive answers

In progressCompany's own claimOfficial ↗

Problem

Complex building regulations made legal interpretation time-consuming and contributed to permitting delays.

Approach

AURI released Archilaw V2 in 2024 using GPT-4o and retrieval-augmented generation. It incorporated previous inquiries and authoritative legal interpretations. Experts and public officials evaluated its answers.

Results

78%agreement with officials' definitive answers in AURI's evaluationCompany's own claim[1]
60.4%surveyed experts and public officials satisfied with system-generated answers, per AURICompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

The evaluation covered questions with definitive official answers. Conversation context and reliable incorporation of legal amendments remained limitations.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

Source summaries

[1]Architecture & Urban Research Institute24 Dec 2025

AURI described the tested system and its remaining limitations. It reported 78% agreement with definitive official answers and 60.4% user satisfaction.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 1 Nov 2026 · Updated 1 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗