← Cases
United StatesHealthcare and life sciences2026 – ongoing

Carta Healthcare

Claude-based evidence extraction for clinical registry data abstraction

Carta Healthcare cut clinical data abstraction time by up to 66% with Claude

WorkingVendor case studyVendor ↗

Problem

Abstractors had to search medical records by hand for answers that feed clinical registries. The work was slow and costly, and complex surgical cases took 5-6 hours.

Approach

Carta built its Lighthouse platform on Claude through Amazon Bedrock. In a two-phase pipeline, Claude Haiku 3.5 and Sonnet 4 extract information from structured data and clinical notes, and Claude Sonnet then suggests answers and ranks the evidence. Abstractors now validate findings instead of searching for them, and clinical experts can adjust prompts and test changes in production the same day.

Results

up to 66%reduction in clinical data abstraction time, per AnthropicVendor case study[1]
50%cost savings on abstraction work, per AnthropicVendor case study[1]
about 90 minutestime for complex cases in one large health system, down from 5-6 hours, per AnthropicVendor case study[1]
98-99%inter-rater reliability, per AnthropicVendor case study[1]

Takeaway

Moving staff from searching records to checking suggested answers cut time most on the complex cases.

Categories

Business function
Production and quality
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Vendor case study

Sources

Source summaries

[1]Anthropic13 Jan 2026

Anthropic describes Carta Healthcare's Lighthouse platform, which uses Claude to extract and rank evidence for registry abstraction. It reports up to 66% less time, 50% cost savings and 98-99% inter-rater reliability. In one large health system routine cases fell from 30 to 15-22 minutes and complex cases from 5-6 hours to about 90 minutes. The page carries no date; the Internet Archive first saved it on January 13, 2026.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 4 Nov 2026 · Updated 4 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗