← Cases
United KingdomFinance and insurance2026 – ongoing

Lloyds Banking Group

Pega GenAI extraction and drafting for commercial banking cases

Lloyds reported 99% extraction accuracy after adding generative AI to asset-finance cases

WorkingVendor case studyVendor ↗

Problem

Commercial banking staff manually copied PDF data into case forms. Complaint handlers also read lengthy correspondence before drafting responses.

Approach

Lloyds redesigned its Pega workflow and used GenAI Connect to extract fields from structured PDFs. It extended generative AI to complaint summaries and draft letters, with employees approving output before clients received it.

Results

99%accuracy in asset-finance data extraction, per PegaVendor case study[1]
over 500hours of manual effort saved in asset finance, per PegaVendor case study[1]

Takeaway

Asset-finance savings were reported after deployment; complaint-handling savings remained projections.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Vendor case study

Sources

Source summaries

[1]Pega2026

Pega reported 99% extraction accuracy and over 500 hours saved across over 5,000 asset-finance cases. Employees reviewed complaint summaries and draft letters; the associated time savings were projected.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 1 Nov 2026 · Updated 1 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗