← Cases
BrazilHealthcare and life sciences2024 – ongoing

Orizon

Generative AI for medical billing rules and fraud detection

Orizon now processes 63% of medical-rule tasks automatically with generative AI

WorkingVendor case studyVendor ↗

Problem

Orizon, a health tech company in the Bradesco Group, runs a platform that detects fraud in medical billing across insurers, hospitals and doctors. Its system held around 40,000 medical rules and added around 1,500 new ones each month. Business users depended on developers to query and understand the rules.

Approach

Orizon fine-tuned Llama2-code and DBRX models on its own data and business rules and served them through Databricks Model Serving. It connected a language model to Microsoft Teams so business users could ask about medical rules and get explanations without a developer. It also used the models to write code documentation.

Results

63%share of tasks processed automatically with the new generative AI features, per DatabricksVendor case study[1]
5 minutestime to build code documentation, per DatabricksVendor case study[1]
1.5 developersdeveloper capacity freed, per DatabricksVendor case study[1]
about $30,000 a monthsavings from better-used resources, per DatabricksVendor case study[1]

Takeaway

Putting a language model in the chat tool staff already use moved routine rule questions away from developers. The company reported freed developer time as well as a share of tasks handled automatically.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Vendor case study

Sources

  1. Protecting sensitive information in the healthcare industry
    Databricks17 Jul 2024Vendor publication

Source summaries

[1]Databricks17 Jul 2024

Databricks describes how Orizon used fine-tuned language models and a Teams-based assistant to handle medical rule tasks. The page reports 63% of tasks processed automatically, code documentation built in about five minutes, one and a half developers freed and about $30,000 a month in savings. The page does not say how the savings were measured.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 4 Nov 2026 · Updated 4 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗