← Cases
AustraliaHealthcare and life sciences2023

South Metropolitan Health Service

ChatGPT-assisted clinical documentation

South Metropolitan Health Service stopped ChatGPT use involving patient information after a doctor generated a discharge summary

StoppedPress reporting

Problem

The Perth health service wanted to make administrative work more efficient. A doctor used an AI chatbot to generate a patient discharge summary.

Approach

On 8 May 2023, chief executive Paul Forden emailed staff ordering an immediate stop to AI use involving patient information or potentially sensitive health service information. He said patient confidentiality could not be assured and the security risks were not fully understood. The service subsequently clarified that the incident involved one doctor and that the input contained no identifiable patient information, with no grounds to believe confidentiality had been breached. Forden said the restriction concerned unapproved use and that other approved AI projects continued.

Results

1doctor identified by the service as having generated a discharge summary with an AI chatbotCompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

A clinician used a public chatbot before the service had approved its handling of clinical information. The service restricted that workflow while continuing separate AI projects under organizational oversight.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Press reporting

Sources

  1. Ban on bot use when patient data involved
    The Medical Republic2 Jun 2023News article

Source summaries

[1]The Medical Republic2 Jun 2023

The publication obtained the 8 May directive and interviewed chief executive Paul Forden. He said one doctor had generated a discharge summary without entering identifiable patient information. He described the restriction as precautionary and said other AI projects continued.

[2]ABC News28 May 2023

ABC obtained the email ordering staff to stop AI use involving patient or sensitive service information. Its report included the service's clarification that one doctor had used the tool for a discharge summary and that no patient confidentiality breach had occurred.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 4 Nov 2026 · Updated 4 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗