← Cases
United KingdomPublic sector2023 – ongoing

Department for Transport

Consultation Analysis Tool for thematic analysis

DfT's consultation tool scored 0.93 F1 against human-adjusted theme mappings in live pilots

WorkingCompany's own claimOfficial ↗

Problem

Manual analysis of free-text consultation responses required substantial staff time. Large consultations could force analysts to work from samples.

Approach

DfT and The Alan Turing Institute developed CAT using Google's Gemini models. It generated themes, which researchers reviewed before the tool classified responses against them. The team evaluated the system using blind benchmarks and live pilots.

Results

0.93theme-mapping F1 against human-adjusted classifications in non-blind live pilots, per DfTCompany's own claim[1]
0.75theme-mapping F1 against human benchmarks in blind evaluation, per DfTCompany's own claim[1]

Takeaway

The live-pilot comparison used human reviewers who could see and amend the AI classifications. Its score cannot be treated as a blind-test result.

Categories

Innovation type
Process innovation
AI technology
Generative AI
Evidence
Company's own claim

Sources

  1. AI Consultation Analysis Tool (CAT) v1.0 Evaluation
    Department for Transport23 Dec 2025Company publication

Source summaries

[1]Department for Transport23 Dec 2025

DfT reported results from live consultations and blind benchmarks. Theme-mapping F1 was 0.93 against human-adjusted pilot classifications and 0.75 in blind evaluation.

Full details are in the original sources.

Added 1 Nov 2026 · Updated 1 Nov 2026
Open case page ↗